Annexure

A sample of Judgments given with improper understanding and as ‘knee-jerk’ reactions to media coverage, all revised later on. Most of such judgments are made upon Suo-moto or PIL cases on matters raised in the media or by NGOs with support from vested interests with their hidden agendas, mostly from abroad, that seek to prevent the growth of the Indian industry and economy or to market their own products/projects here

1. Banning of large cars/SUVs in Delhi as being major contributors to environmental pollution. Without recognizing that it was the burning of crop residue in the fields of neighbouring States and of the use of 2-wheelers and dust from the streets that were the main causes. In any case the exhaust of a modern performance car would have less particulate matter than the intake air. Its filtration system being required to clear the air to protect the engine.
2. Not understanding the definition of an SUV in Europe or USA and in India and the differences between them, and that just having a some-what higher ground clearance and higher seating position and calling it a Compact SUV, doesn’t make it a true SUV and hence, a car not really having the disadvantages of a true SUV.
3. Insisting on European standards for cars safety and emission norms without understanding the differences in the use of vehicles and of the operating conditions and of the type of vehicles (2-wheelers and 4-wheelers) and of the availability of fuel of appropriate specification, there and here.Again, at the cry of the Media and the NGOs that were used and funded by vested interests abroad to prevent the competition there from the Indian auto industry especially in the small car space. Also, not recognizing the need for 2-Wheeler owners to be able to afford to upgrade to a safer 4-wheeler even if it does not have all the safety features, as it would in any case be safer than the 2-wheeler, with perhaps only seat belts. The introduction of the Bajaj Quadricycle is a step in the right direction. Other manufacturers should also be encouraged to release low-cost cars.
4. Insisting on High Security Number plates for vehicles for the benefit of the Contractors even as the technology of RFIDs has long replaced that of such number plates.
5. Making gender equality the foundation for ordering women’s entry into specific temples (See- “Sabarimala Temple case) without understanding the effect of the Earth’s energy grids on them. This is applicable only to ancient Indian Temples built with consideration of the effect of Earth’s energy nodes on specific cells in the human body. (See-”Temples & Earth’s Energy Grids”).
6. Not properly understanding the difference between a place for Prayer and a place for Worship and of the recognition of a Hindu Deity as a ‘Juristic’ person and a ward of its representative. (See -’The Ayodhya case’)
7. Not properly understanding the restrictions in the Coastal zone regulations as being against coastal and marine development even as it is allowed in all other countries, again at the behest of Parties with vested interests.
8. Similarly, in the matter of setting up energy or development projects in so far undeveloped regions where rights are wrongly claimed, on behalf of so called Adivasis. Especially in regions which are clearly shown by archaeological evidence of earlier urbanization, since abandoned for some reason or the other. Again, prompted by the cry of the Media and NGOs that were used and funded by foreign vested interests.
9. Not realizing the deleterious effect of Non-Functional Upgrades (NFU) of pay in performance/merit-based organizations, especially Government organizations.
10. Not properly understanding that the Armed Forces Special Protection Act (AFSPA) comes into effect only for the period and where the Government has declared the area as disturbed and beyond the control of the administration, the Police and even the Judiciary, when action is needed to keep the Country together and when failure is not an option. That is when the Armed Forces step in, and to act effectively they need to be protected against calls of human rights violations and use of excessive force by NGOs and other vested interests and media. In such circumstances we need to accept that collateral losses will occur and we must trust in the training and internal monitoring and disciplinary controls of the Armed forces. (See-”Armed Forces Special Powers Act – Understanding its application.”)

JAI BHARAT! – JAI HIND!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5